A manifesto for reproducible science¶
Munafò, Nosek, & Bishop. (2017). A manifesto for reproducible science. Nature Human Behaviour.
Cited by¶
2 citations across 2 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- File Drawer Problem
- The principal institutional responses — pre-registration of trials before data collection (eliminating the filter prospectively), registered reports (decoupling publication decisions from results), trial-result reporting mandates for pharmaceutical sponsors, and meta-analytic correction methods (funnel plots, trim-and-fill, p-curve, Egger regression, selection models) — are all designed to either eliminate the filter or estimate and correct for the hidden mass it has already produced
This sourcePre-registration, introduced in clinical medicine to address publication bias and analytical flexibility, and the Registered Reports format, which accepts studies before results are known and so prevents publication bias.
Supported in partVerified against a saved copy of the source
“Publication bias47, also known as the file drawer problem48, refers to the fact that many more studies are conducted than published.”
- The principal institutional responses — pre-registration of trials before data collection (eliminating the filter prospectively), registered reports (decoupling publication decisions from results), trial-result reporting mandates for pharmaceutical sponsors, and meta-analytic correction methods (funnel plots, trim-and-fill, p-curve, Egger regression, selection models) — are all designed to either eliminate the filter or estimate and correct for the hidden mass it has already produced
- Null Ritual
- Across all of these the transfer is literal because the substrate is literally the same — one specific hybrid test deployed within one specific publication culture — so the diagnostic signature carries untranslated (no stated alternative, no effect size that would matter, no prior, no decision the verdict informs; the p = .049/.051 cliff; non-rejection read as equivalence), and so does the causal account (an institutionally enforced form, not a comprehension failure) and the consequent prediction about reform: only interventions that restructure editorial incentives bite, which is why the field-internal cures — registered reports, mandated estimation statistics and effect sizes, pre-registration, bright-line abandonment, outright NHST bans of the kind Basic and Applied Social Psychology imposed in 2015 — are the ones that move the practice while teaching p-value semantics does not
This sourceA reproducibility manifesto promoting registered reports, pre-registration and coordinated incentive change (while also endorsing improved statistical training).
Supported in partVerified against the work's full text
“journals are adopting the Registered Reports publishing format”
- Across all of these the transfer is literal because the substrate is literally the same — one specific hybrid test deployed within one specific publication culture — so the diagnostic signature carries untranslated (no stated alternative, no effect size that would matter, no prior, no decision the verdict informs; the p = .049/.051 cliff; non-rejection read as equivalence), and so does the causal account (an institutionally enforced form, not a comprehension failure) and the consequent prediction about reform: only interventions that restructure editorial incentives bite, which is why the field-internal cures — registered reports, mandated estimation statistics and effect sizes, pre-registration, bright-line abandonment, outright NHST bans of the kind Basic and Applied Social Psychology imposed in 2015 — are the ones that move the practice while teaching p-value semantics does not
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 2 of 2 citations: 2 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:32310f6fa0c6 · see in the full table