Do studies of statistical power have an effect on the power of studies¶
Sedlmeier, P., & Gigerenzer, G. (1989). Do studies of statistical power have an effect on the power of studies. Psychological Bulletin, 105(2), 309-316.
Cited by¶
2 citations across 2 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Hypothesis Testing (Null vs. Alternative)
- Across clinical trials (pre-specified primary/secondary endpoints with multiplicity adjustment; regulatory approval thresholds), psychology experiments (ANOVA, mixed models, permutation tests; garden-of-forking-paths risk), physics discoveries (likelihood ratios; look-elsewhere multiplicity; 5σ discovery threshold), regression econometrics (t and Wald tests on coefficients; specification tests), GWAS (extreme multiplicity; 5×10⁻⁸ threshold), acceptance sampling (α = producer's risk, β = consumer's risk), quality control (Shewhart rules as implicit hypothesis tests), A/B testing (p-value and sequential testing with α-spending), and ML model comparison (paired tests; permutation feature-importance): the core logic—pre-specified hypothesis, test statistic with known null distribution, pre-specified α, disciplined decision
This sourceSedlmeier-Gigerenzer documenting persistent underpowering in psychology despite power-analysis availability.
- Across clinical trials (pre-specified primary/secondary endpoints with multiplicity adjustment; regulatory approval thresholds), psychology experiments (ANOVA, mixed models, permutation tests; garden-of-forking-paths risk), physics discoveries (likelihood ratios; look-elsewhere multiplicity; 5σ discovery threshold), regression econometrics (t and Wald tests on coefficients; specification tests), GWAS (extreme multiplicity; 5×10⁻⁸ threshold), acceptance sampling (α = producer's risk, β = consumer's risk), quality control (Shewhart rules as implicit hypothesis tests), A/B testing (p-value and sequential testing with α-spending), and ML model comparison (paired tests; permutation feature-importance): the core logic—pre-specified hypothesis, test statistic with known null distribution, pre-specified α, disciplined decision
- Statistical Power
This sourceSedlmeier-Gigerenzer documenting persistent underpowering in psychology despite power-analysis availability.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. Neither this nor any other of the 2 citations of this work carries a recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:325bfbf12486 · see in the full table