Laboratory Turnaround Time¶
Hawkins, R. C. (2007). Laboratory Turnaround Time. 28(4), 179-194.
Cited by¶
2 citations across 2 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Evidence-Latency Window
- A result clock. The evidence that would best inform the decision becomes available only at time E, on a separate clock often governed by a different actor: culture turnaround, forensic confirmation, weather resolution, assay time, clearing latency.
This sourceReviews laboratory turnaround time — the elapsed interval from order to result report, governed by the testing process rather than the clinician — establishing the separate result clock on which informing evidence arrives.
- A result clock. The evidence that would best inform the decision becomes available only at time E, on a separate clock often governed by a different actor: culture turnaround, forensic confirmation, weather resolution, assay time, clearing latency.
Domain-specific¶
- Wave Picking
- Rather than testing each tube on arrival, analysers process racked batches: specimens are grouped by assay and reporting window, held until a run starts, then move through analysis, technologist review, and result reporting in step
This sourceA review of laboratory turnaround time that distinguishes continuous from batch testing and describes morning specimens transported in batches so that 'testing can begin on the first batch of specimens'.
Supported in partVerified against a saved copy of the source
“the practice of delivering each specimen as it is collected, pneumatic tube delivery system, direct delivery route, and continuous versus batch testing.”
- Rather than testing each tube on arrival, analysers process racked batches: specimens are grouped by assay and reporting window, held until a run starts, then move through analysis, technologist review, and result reporting in step
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 2 citations: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:32b364c26761 · see in the full table