Secondary Economic Sanctions

Lipsky, J. Secondary Economic Sanctions: Effective Policy or Risky Business?.

Type

Web resource

Intellectual base

Web

Link

https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/in-depth-research-reports/issue-brief/secondary-economic-sanctions-effective-policy-or-risky-business/

Cited from

military_strategic_studies

Cited by

1 citation across 1 artifact.

Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.

Primes

• Compellence
  • Software, platforms, and economic sanctions: forced upgrades with continuing degradation until update, bot-detection challenges blocking service until verified, and secondary-sanctions regimes escalating until a state changes policy.

    This sourceAnalyzes secondary sanctions as a coercive instrument applying escalating pressure to induce third parties and target states to change policy. (Resolves needs-source-905 for the secondary-sanctions claim; the software forced-upgrade / bot-detection portion of the original marker is not covered by this source — see flag.)

    Supported in partVerified against the work's full text

    The brief supports only the sanctions part: sanctioning states can ratchet pressure up or down by widening scope, aimed at policy change; it says nothing on software forced upgrades or bot challenges.

    “Expanding the scope of economic sanctions provides sanctioning countries the flexibility to ratchet up or down the effects of economic sanctions”

    Read by an automated reader; not a human review. How support was checked

Verification

Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.

Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.

Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.

See how references were verified.

Registry ID ref:32ccd8e6dfd2 · see in the full table