The Passing of the Kuznets Cycle¶
Abramovitz, M. (1968). The Passing of the Kuznets Cycle. Economica.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Kuznets swing
- Outside that historical context, the swing has no robust independent existence and is contested in mainstream macroeconomics, where its content is largely absorbed into the housing-cycle and demographic-accounting literatures
This sourceThe swing's leading proponent retiring his own hypothesis - Abramovitz argues the Kuznets cycle ceased to be identifiable after its original historical period, without denying it existed then.
Supported in partVerified against the source
- Outside that historical context, the swing has no robust independent existence and is contested in mainstream macroeconomics, where its content is largely absorbed into the housing-cycle and demographic-accounting literatures
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:32e1f9cbc40b · see in the full table