Baker v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [1999] 2 S.C.R. 817¶
Supreme Court of Canada. (1999). Baker v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [1999] 2 S.C.R. 817.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Mechanisms¶
- Written Decision Notice
- Its strength is that it makes the decision inspectable and therefore contestable: the duty to give reasons — the administrative-law principle that a decision affecting someone must be explained — is what converts "trust us" into "here is our reasoning, check it."
This sourceTreats the duty to give reasons as making an administrative decision inspectable, understandable, and open to meaningful challenge.
- Its strength is that it makes the decision inspectable and therefore contestable: the duty to give reasons — the administrative-law principle that a decision affecting someone must be explained — is what converts "trust us" into "here is our reasoning, check it."
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:33ee74aba2a1 · see in the full table