Two-Component Models of Socially Desirable Responding.¶
Paulhus, D. L. (1984). Two-Component Models of Socially Desirable Responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(3), 598-609.
Cited by¶
2 citations across 2 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Public vs. Private Contexts
- A core function of "public vs. private contexts" is to separate audience effects (presence of observer changes salience of reputation) from authentic preference differences (individuals genuinely prefer different things in different contexts), a separation Paulhus (1984) operationalizes in his two-component model distinguishing impression management from self-deception.
This sourceDistinguishes impression management (deliberate audience-directed self-presentation) from self-deceptive enhancement (genuine private overestimation of self), operationalizing the separation between audience effects and authentic preference differences.
- A core function of "public vs. private contexts" is to separate audience effects (presence of observer changes salience of reputation) from authentic preference differences (individuals genuinely prefer different things in different contexts), a separation Paulhus (1984) operationalizes in his two-component model distinguishing impression management from self-deception.
Domain-specific¶
- Impression Management
This sourceSeparates audience-directed impression management from self-deceptive enhancement.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. Neither this nor any other of the 2 citations of this work carries a recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:33f35764094d · see in the full table