United States v. Microsoft¶
United States Department of Justice. (1999). United States v. Microsoft: Plaintiffs’ Joint Proposed Findings of Fact.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Mechanisms¶
- Open Standard
- Its failure mode is re-capture — a dominant vendor adopts the standard, adds proprietary extensions, and gradually makes its version the one that matters, a pattern documented as embrace, extend, extinguish.
This sourceDocuments a dominant vendor's strategy of embracing open standards, extending them incompatibly, and extinguishing competing implementations.
- Its failure mode is re-capture — a dominant vendor adopts the standard, adds proprietary extensions, and gradually makes its version the one that matters, a pattern documented as embrace, extend, extinguish.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:34085bbf4055 · see in the full table