Pay-for-Performance¶
James, J. (2012). Pay-for-Performance. Health Affairs.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Shirky Principle
- The intervention the prime names falls directly out of the model: invert the coupling so funding tracks reduction, \(B = k \cdot (M_0 - M)\), which makes the survival objective \(\max(M_0 - M)\) coincide with the mission \(\min M\) — or separate the authority that measures \(M\) from the agency paid on it.
This sourceSurveys value-based purchasing / pay-for-performance, which ties payment to measured outcomes (reduction) rather than volume/presence and presupposes a purchaser–provider separation between who funds and who delivers — the remedy family of funding reduction and separating diagnosis from service.
Supported in partVerified against the work's full text
The brief explains paying providers against measured outcomes; it does not cover independence milestones or splitting the diagnosing party from the paid party.
“The typical pay-for-performance program provides a bonus to health care providers if they meet or exceed agreed-upon quality or performance measures”
- The intervention the prime names falls directly out of the model: invert the coupling so funding tracks reduction, \(B = k \cdot (M_0 - M)\), which makes the survival objective \(\max(M_0 - M)\) coincide with the mission \(\min M\) — or separate the authority that measures \(M\) from the agency paid on it.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This work's DOI is recorded above but has not been resolved against an external catalogue, so nothing here confirms the work exists.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:342a3b0891b4 · see in the full table