Vigilance requires hard mental work and is stressful¶
Warm, J. S., Parasuraman, R., & Matthews, G. (2008). Vigilance requires hard mental work and is stressful. Human Factors, 50(3), 433-441.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Cognitive Resource Depletion
- The Pattern is identical across all domains: consumption without restoration → capacity loss → performance degradation → recovery with cessation, a generalization Warm, Parasuraman, and Matthews (2008) demonstrate by showing that vigilance is genuinely effortful and depletes mental resources.
This sourceEvidence that sustained vigilance imposes high mental workload and is genuinely effortful and stressful (resource-theory account) — generalizing the consumption-degradation-recovery pattern across attention (D53-073). Verified with DOI.
Supported in partVerified against the publisher's abstract
The abstract backs the vigilance half — vigilance is hard mental work, stressful, and linked to resource changes with performance decrement — but not the cross-domain 'identical pattern' or the recovery-with-cessation stage.
“Converging evidence using behavioral, neural, and subjective measures shows that vigilance requires hard mental work and is stressful.”
- The Pattern is identical across all domains: consumption without restoration → capacity loss → performance degradation → recovery with cessation, a generalization Warm, Parasuraman, and Matthews (2008) demonstrate by showing that vigilance is genuinely effortful and depletes mental resources.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:35e94234d898 · see in the full table