National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius¶
National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius, 5. U. S. 5. (2012). National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Domain-specific¶
- Difference-in-Differences
- Because the 2012 Supreme Court ruling let each state decide whether to expand Medicaid in 2014, some states expanded and others did not, creating a natural treatment/control split
Supported in partVerified against a saved copy of the source
“As a practical matter, that means States may now choose to reject the expansion; that is the whole point”
- Because the 2012 Supreme Court ruling let each state decide whether to expand Medicaid in 2014, some states expanded and others did not, creating a natural treatment/control split
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:35eee2726c1b · see in the full table