FSF ALAR Briefing Note 7.1 — Stabilized Approach¶
Flight Safety Foundation Approach-and-Landing Accident Reduction (ALAR) Task Force. (2000). FSF ALAR Briefing Note 7.1 — Stabilized Approach. Flight Safety Digest.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Near-Miss Normalization
- In commercial aviation operational safety, a carrier's flight-data monitoring program tracks unstable approaches: an approach where the aircraft crosses a defined gate (height, speed, descent rate) outside stabilized criteria yet lands without incident is a textbook near-miss.
This sourceDefines the approach gate (1,000 ft IMC / 500 ft VMC) and the stabilized-approach criteria (height, speed, descent rate) and recommends FOQA/flight-data monitoring to log unstable-but-landed approaches as a safety-trend signal.
Supported in partVerified against the work's full text
The digest defines the approach gate and stabilized-approach criteria (speed, sink rate, configuration); FOQA appears only as a general recommendation, with no unstable-but-landed monitoring or near-miss framing.
“All flights must be stabilized by 1,000 feet above airport elevation in instrument meteorological conditions (IMC) and by 500 feet above airport elevation in visual meteorological conditions (VMC).”
- In commercial aviation operational safety, a carrier's flight-data monitoring program tracks unstable approaches: an approach where the aircraft crosses a defined gate (height, speed, descent rate) outside stabilized criteria yet lands without incident is a textbook near-miss.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:36d9d15208c3 · see in the full table