Business Cycles¶
Schumpeter, J. A. (1939). Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process. McGraw-Hill.
Cited by¶
3 citations across 3 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Creative Destruction
- Schumpeter's Business Cycles (1939)
This sourceTwo-volume work layering Kitchin, Juglar, and Kondratieff cycles over the innovation-driven process; supports the cyclical-dimension claim.
- Schumpeter's Business Cycles (1939)
- Temporal Synchronization and Phase Alignment
- Anti-phase cycling (some firms growing while others mature) creates smoother market equilibrium.
This sourceFoundational analysis of overlapping business cycles (Kitchin, Juglar, Kondratieff) with distinct natural periods; treats market stability as a function of whether firm-level cycles phase-align (boom-bust amplification) or run anti-phase (smoothing).
- Anti-phase cycling (some firms growing while others mature) creates smoother market equilibrium.
Domain-specific¶
- Kuznets swing
- Schumpeter's three-cycle schema in Business Cycles (1939) is built from the short Kitchin, the Juglar and the long Kondratiev, and has no Kuznets band in it
This sourceThe work the schema comes from — Business Cycles derives a composite of exactly three cycles, the Kitchin, the Juglar and the Kondratiev, and gives the Kuznets swing no band in it; Kuznets appears in the volume only as a methodological citation to Seasonal Variations in Industry and Trade.
SupportedVerified against the source
- Schumpeter's three-cycle schema in Business Cycles (1939) is built from the short Kitchin, the Juglar and the long Kondratiev, and has no Kuznets band in it
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 3 citations: 1 supported. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:37f6c85950e5 · see in the full table