Robust Misinterpretation of Confidence Intervals

Hoekstra, R., Morey, R. D., Rouder, J. N., & Wagenmakers, E. (2014). Robust Misinterpretation of Confidence Intervals. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21(5), 1157-1164.

Type

Journal article

Intellectual base

Primary research

Year

2014

DOI

10.3758/s13423-013-0572-3

Link

https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-013-0572-3

Cited from

statistics_experimental_design

Cited by

2 citations across 2 artifacts.

Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.

Primes

• Confidence Intervals
  • Mature practice uses each framework thoughtfully, matching choice to scientific question and stakeholder context; immature practice declares one framework universally correct and rejects the other

    This sourceSurvey evidence that researchers and students robustly endorse the intuitive (Bayesian) 'there is a 95% probability the true value is in this interval' reading.

• Effect Size

  • This sourceBibliography-only (tier C); linked.

Verification

This reference passed the adversarial substantiation pipeline: it was checked to exist and to support the claim it is attached to. See how references were verified.

Registry ID ref:3a5a0a21eee5 · see in the full table