Randomized Ablation Feature Importance¶
Merrick, L. (2019). Randomized Ablation Feature Importance.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Mechanisms¶
- Feature Ablation Comparison
- Its strength is a defensible answer to "does this feature earn its keep," which is exactly what a bloated, expensive feature set needs; it is the standard corrective to feature proliferation and the honest basis for retirement.
This sourceMeasures a feature’s importance by ablating it and observing the resulting change in model loss.
- Its strength is a defensible answer to "does this feature earn its keep," which is exactly what a bloated, expensive feature set needs; it is the standard corrective to feature proliferation and the honest basis for retirement.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:3bc521abb275 · see in the full table