Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas.¶
Skinner, Q. (1969). Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas. History and Theory, 8(1), 3-53.
Cited by¶
4 citations across 4 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Anachronism
- As Skinner (1969) argued in his foundational critique of the "mythology of doctrines," anachronism is the placement of an element (object, concept, practice, term, attitude) into a time where it does not belong.
This sourceFoundational critique of the 'mythology of doctrines,' 'prolepsis,' and 'parochialism' — identifies how anachronistic reading distorts interpretation of past thought; directly supports the Core-Idea definition (D40-061).
- As Skinner (1969) argued in his foundational critique of the "mythology of doctrines," anachronism is the placement of an element (object, concept, practice, term, attitude) into a time where it does not belong.
- Historical Empathy
- Building on Skinner's (1969) Cambridge-School warnings about the "mythology of doctrines" and "mythology of prolepsis" in the history of ideas, in educational contexts historical empathy is assessed through rubrics that measure whether learners can: (1) identify the information available to a historical actor at a decision point, (2) identify the values and constraints that shaped the actor's choices, (3) explain why a given action appeared reasonable or necessary given those constraints, and (4) distinguish between "understanding why someone acted that way" and "approving of that action."
This sourceFoundational critique of the "mythology of doctrines," "mythology of prolepsis," and "mythology of parochialism" — early identification of how anachronistic reading distorts interpretation of past thought.
- Building on Skinner's (1969) Cambridge-School warnings about the "mythology of doctrines" and "mythology of prolepsis" in the history of ideas, in educational contexts historical empathy is assessed through rubrics that measure whether learners can: (1) identify the information available to a historical actor at a decision point, (2) identify the values and constraints that shaped the actor's choices, (3) explain why a given action appeared reasonable or necessary given those constraints, and (4) distinguish between "understanding why someone acted that way" and "approving of that action."
- Historicism
- Skinner (1969), in his foundational essay "Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas" and the larger Cambridge school contextualist program, reconstructs the specific political vocabulary and institutional context within which early modern political thought was generated.
This sourceFoundational critique of the "mythology of doctrines," "mythology of prolepsis," and "mythology of parochialism" — early identification of how anachronistic reading distorts interpretation of past thought.
- Skinner (1969), in his foundational essay "Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas" and the larger Cambridge school contextualist program, reconstructs the specific political vocabulary and institutional context within which early modern political thought was generated.
- Presentism
- A frame-importation error in which the interpreter's default value-and-information set leaks into the interpretation of a past context instead of being replaced by a reconstruction of the past context's own frame.
This sourceFoundational critique of the "mythology of doctrines," "mythology of prolepsis," and "mythology of parochialism" — early identification of how anachronistic reading distorts interpretation of past thought.
- A frame-importation error in which the interpreter's default value-and-information set leaks into the interpretation of a past context instead of being replaced by a reconstruction of the past context's own frame.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. Neither this nor any other of the 4 citations of this work carries a recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:3c2412949ebc · see in the full table