STOPP/START Criteria for Potentially Inappropriate Prescribing in Older People¶
O'Mahony, D. (2015). STOPP/START Criteria for Potentially Inappropriate Prescribing in Older People: Version 2. Age and Ageing.
Cited by¶
2 citations across 2 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Polypharmacy
- Clinical management rests on two frameworks: the Beers criteria (American Geriatrics Society) and STOPP/START (O'Mahony and colleagues)
This sourceThe STOPP/START version-2 criteria by O'Mahony and colleagues, one of the standing frameworks for potentially inappropriate prescribing in older people.
Supported in partVerified against the publisher's abstract
“Screening tool of older people's prescriptions (STOPP) and screening tool to alert to right treatment (START) criteria were first published in 2008.”
- Clinical management rests on two frameworks: the Beers criteria (American Geriatrics Society) and STOPP/START (O'Mahony and colleagues)
- Therapeutic Duplication
- Medication reconciliation at care transitions — the canonical fix-point: admission, transfer, and discharge are where the home list, admitting orders, and cross-cover additions are finally read end-to-end as one set, so same-class stacking can be detected and resolved. E-prescribing clinical decision support — duplicate-therapy alerts fire at order entry when a new agent shares a pharmacologic class with one already on the list, the automated form of the class-scan across multiple ordering providers. Hospital pharmacy review — the inpatient pharmacist verifying an order set against the active medication profile catches additive same-target exposure (two NSAIDs, three benzodiazepine-receptor agents) that no single prescriber assembled. Geriatric polypharmacy audit — deprescribing and polypharmacy review in patients on a dozen-plus agents is a habitat where unintended same-class duplication is both common and high-harm, surfaced by grouping the list by target class
This sourceThe STOPP/START screening criteria for potentially inappropriate prescribing in older people, among whom polypharmacy and inappropriate prescriptions are common and closely linked to adverse drug events.
Supported in partVerified against the source
- Medication reconciliation at care transitions — the canonical fix-point: admission, transfer, and discharge are where the home list, admitting orders, and cross-cover additions are finally read end-to-end as one set, so same-class stacking can be detected and resolved. E-prescribing clinical decision support — duplicate-therapy alerts fire at order entry when a new agent shares a pharmacologic class with one already on the list, the automated form of the class-scan across multiple ordering providers. Hospital pharmacy review — the inpatient pharmacist verifying an order set against the active medication profile catches additive same-target exposure (two NSAIDs, three benzodiazepine-receptor agents) that no single prescriber assembled. Geriatric polypharmacy audit — deprescribing and polypharmacy review in patients on a dozen-plus agents is a habitat where unintended same-class duplication is both common and high-harm, surfaced by grouping the list by target class
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This work's DOI is recorded above but has not been resolved against an external catalogue, so nothing here confirms the work exists.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 2 of 2 citations: 2 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:3cec942059a6 · see in the full table