Economic Growth and Subjective Well-Being¶
Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. (2008). Economic Growth and Subjective Well-Being: Reassessing the Easterlin Paradox.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Domain-specific¶
- Atomistic Fallacy
- But the cross-level gradients are contested: the classic reading has them far weaker or absent, because country-level forces — relative-income comparison, inequality, and public-goods provision — introduce variance with no individual-level counterpart, decoupling the two levels, while recent multi-country evidence finds the cross-country gradient robust and the over-time gradient positive
Supported in partVerified against the source
- But the cross-level gradients are contested: the classic reading has them far weaker or absent, because country-level forces — relative-income comparison, inequality, and public-goods provision — introduce variance with no individual-level counterpart, decoupling the two levels, while recent multi-country evidence finds the cross-country gradient robust and the over-time gradient positive
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This work's DOI is recorded above but has not been resolved against an external catalogue, so nothing here confirms the work exists.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:3d2f646251bf · see in the full table