The Game of Chicken.¶
Rapoport, A., & Chammah, A. M. (1966). The Game of Chicken. American Behavioral Scientist, 10(3).
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Anti-Coordination Game
- In game theory its canonical instances are Hawk-Dove, Chicken, and the Snowdrift game, and equilibrium-selection theory for them is a central body of work.
This sourceEarly game-theoretic treatment of Chicken (the anti-coordination / Snowdrift family) and its asymmetric equilibria.
Supported in partVerified against the publisher's abstract
The abstract shows a 1966 game-theoretic treatment of Chicken (brinksmanship/appeasement), i.e. one instance of the family; it does not mention Hawk-Dove, Snowdrift, or equilibrium-selection theory.
“Behavior in a game simulating brinksmanship and appeasement is analyzed as a function of varying parameters in the game and as over-time trends.”
- In game theory its canonical instances are Hawk-Dove, Chicken, and the Snowdrift game, and equilibrium-selection theory for them is a central body of work.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:3d9006aca979 · see in the full table