An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein¶
Sabatier. (1988). An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein. Policy Sciences.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Policy Design
- Schneider and Ingram's work on target population construction and Howlett's on instrument choice each occupy one of the six components as their central analytical object, while Sabatier's advocacy-coalition framework centres on the belief systems of advocacy coalitions rather than on any single component
This sourceSabatier's framework, whose own abstract locates it in the belief systems of advocacy coalitions within policy subsystems rather than in a single design component.
Supported in partVerified against the source
- Schneider and Ingram's work on target population construction and Howlett's on instrument choice each occupy one of the six components as their central analytical object, while Sabatier's advocacy-coalition framework centres on the belief systems of advocacy coalitions rather than on any single component
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This work's DOI is recorded above but has not been resolved against an external catalogue, so nothing here confirms the work exists.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:3dd1d3e8c423 · see in the full table