The Rationale for Rationale¶
van Gelder, T. (2007). The Rationale for Rationale. Law, Probability and Risk.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Mechanisms¶
- Thesis-Antithesis Mapping
- Its strength is that it forces the hidden parts of a disagreement — protected values, unstated assumptions, applicability limits — into the open where they can be compared, which is exactly the value of argument mapping: making the structure of a debate visible so people stop talking past each other.
This sourceLaw, Probability and Risk. Presents argument mapping as a visual, semi-formal representation that makes reasoning structure explicit.
- Its strength is that it forces the hidden parts of a disagreement — protected values, unstated assumptions, applicability limits — into the open where they can be compared, which is exactly the value of argument mapping: making the structure of a debate visible so people stop talking past each other.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:3e5e3ee4f865 · see in the full table