The Legitimation of Power¶
Beetham, D. (1991). The Legitimation of Power.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Legitimacy
- As Beetham (1991) systematized in The Legitimation of Power, legitimacy is the structural property of an authority such that: (1) those subject to the authority voluntarily comply with its rules and decisions, treating the authority as rightful rather than merely powerful — compliance that does not depend on continuous coercion; (2) legitimacy has multiple distinct sources, which operate independently and sometimes reinforce or compete — procedural legitimacy (fair process), democratic legitimacy (authorization by the governed), performance legitimacy (demonstrated competence), traditional legitimacy (inherited authority), charismatic legitimacy (exceptional-leader allegiance), and legal legitimacy (authorization by a recognized rule structure); (3) legitimacy is socially constructed and perceived — an authority can be legally valid but perceived as illegitimate, or perceived as legitimate without formal legal basis; perception determines compliance behavior more reliably than formal validity; (4) legitimacy is stock-like rather than flow-like — it is built slowly through repeated demonstrations of fitness across sources and can be depleted rapidly by visible abuse or failure; rebuilding legitimacy once lost is typically far harder than preserving it.
This sourceMacmillan. Systematic reconstruction of legitimacy with three dimensions (rule-conformity, shared beliefs, evidence of consent), foundational to the post-Weberian analytic literature on perceived rightfulness of authority.
- As Beetham (1991) systematized in The Legitimation of Power, legitimacy is the structural property of an authority such that: (1) those subject to the authority voluntarily comply with its rules and decisions, treating the authority as rightful rather than merely powerful — compliance that does not depend on continuous coercion; (2) legitimacy has multiple distinct sources, which operate independently and sometimes reinforce or compete — procedural legitimacy (fair process), democratic legitimacy (authorization by the governed), performance legitimacy (demonstrated competence), traditional legitimacy (inherited authority), charismatic legitimacy (exceptional-leader allegiance), and legal legitimacy (authorization by a recognized rule structure); (3) legitimacy is socially constructed and perceived — an authority can be legally valid but perceived as illegitimate, or perceived as legitimate without formal legal basis; perception determines compliance behavior more reliably than formal validity; (4) legitimacy is stock-like rather than flow-like — it is built slowly through repeated demonstrations of fitness across sources and can be depleted rapidly by visible abuse or failure; rebuilding legitimacy once lost is typically far harder than preserving it.
Verification¶
This reference passed the adversarial substantiation pipeline: it was checked to exist and to support the claim it is attached to. See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:3e9bd0392d1e · see in the full table