The Legitimation of Power¶
Beetham, D. (1991). The Legitimation of Power.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Legitimacy
- As Beetham (1991) systematized in The Legitimation of Power, legitimacy is the structural property of an authority such that: (1) those subject to the authority voluntarily comply with its rules and decisions, treating the authority as rightful rather than merely powerful — compliance that does not depend on continuous coercion; (2) legitimacy has multiple distinct sources, which operate independently and sometimes reinforce or compete — procedural legitimacy (fair process), democratic legitimacy (authorization by the governed), performance legitimacy (demonstrated competence), traditional legitimacy (inherited authority), charismatic legitimacy (exceptional-leader allegiance), and legal legitimacy (authorization by a recognized rule structure); (3) legitimacy is socially constructed and perceived — an authority can be legally valid but perceived as illegitimate, or perceived as legitimate without formal legal basis; perception determines compliance behavior more reliably than formal validity; (4) legitimacy is stock-like rather than flow-like — it is built slowly through repeated demonstrations of fitness across sources and can be depleted rapidly by visible abuse or failure; rebuilding legitimacy once lost is typically far harder than preserving it.
This sourceMacmillan. Systematic reconstruction of legitimacy with three dimensions (rule-conformity, shared beliefs, evidence of consent), foundational to the post-Weberian analytic literature on perceived rightfulness of authority.
- As Beetham (1991) systematized in The Legitimation of Power, legitimacy is the structural property of an authority such that: (1) those subject to the authority voluntarily comply with its rules and decisions, treating the authority as rightful rather than merely powerful — compliance that does not depend on continuous coercion; (2) legitimacy has multiple distinct sources, which operate independently and sometimes reinforce or compete — procedural legitimacy (fair process), democratic legitimacy (authorization by the governed), performance legitimacy (demonstrated competence), traditional legitimacy (inherited authority), charismatic legitimacy (exceptional-leader allegiance), and legal legitimacy (authorization by a recognized rule structure); (3) legitimacy is socially constructed and perceived — an authority can be legally valid but perceived as illegitimate, or perceived as legitimate without formal legal basis; perception determines compliance behavior more reliably than formal validity; (4) legitimacy is stock-like rather than flow-like — it is built slowly through repeated demonstrations of fitness across sources and can be depleted rapidly by visible abuse or failure; rebuilding legitimacy once lost is typically far harder than preserving it.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:3e9bd0392d1e · see in the full table