Introduction¶
Solove, D. J. (2013). Introduction: Privacy Self-Management and the Consent Dilemma. Harvard Law Review, 126(7), 1880-1903.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Consent
- Naming consent specifically enables audit of these erosions and provides a vocabulary for recognizing the legitimating-transformative effect that distinguishes genuine authorization from mere acquiescence.
This sourceThe canonical 'consent dilemma' critique of privacy self-management and cookie-banner 'consent theater'; supports D21-070 and D21-073.
Supported in partVerified against the work's full text
Gives the general consent-dilemma principle that privacy self-management grants people no meaningful control over their data, but not the banner mechanics, the voluntariness condition, or the informational-competence precondition.
“Consent legitimizes nearly any form of collection, use, or disclosure of personal data. Although privacy self-management is certainly a laudable and necessary component of any regulatory regime, I contend that it is being tasked with doing work beyond its capabilities. Privacy self-management does not provide people with meaningful control over their data.”
- Naming consent specifically enables audit of these erosions and provides a vocabulary for recognizing the legitimating-transformative effect that distinguishes genuine authorization from mere acquiescence.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:3f18e0d95ad9 · see in the full table