Testing the Myth of the Encoding–Retrieval Match¶
Goh, W. D., & Lu, S. H. X. (2012). Testing the Myth of the Encoding–Retrieval Match. Memory & Cognition, 28-39.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Transfer-Appropriate Processing
- Retrieval cues must also discriminate the target from competitors; greater match can help, do nothing, or hurt when it also increases cue overload.
This sourceThree primary experiments varying encoding-retrieval match and cue overload, supporting relative diagnostic value over absolute match.
- Retrieval cues must also discriminate the target from competitors; greater match can help, do nothing, or hurt when it also increases cue overload.
Verification¶
This reference passed the adversarial substantiation pipeline: it was checked to exist and to support the claim it is attached to. See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:3f30465c02b4 · see in the full table