Introductory Phonology

Hayes, B. (2009). Introductory Phonology. Wiley-Blackwell.

Type

Book

Intellectual base

Textbook

Year

2009

Link

https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Introductory+Phonology-p-9781405184113

Cited from

linguistics_semiotics

Cited by

3 citations across 3 artifacts.

Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.

Primes

• Local Sequence Legality
  • Phonotactics: each language admits some phoneme sequences (English str- onsets, Japanese open syllables) and forbids others, with the legality verdict on the syllable rather than on the word's meaning.

    This sourcePhonotactic constraints — which phoneme sequences (e.g., English str- onsets) a language admits — as a local well-formedness verdict on the syllable.

Domain-specific

• Allophone
  • Phonology and phonetics — the core technical home: aspiration alternations, voicing assimilation, American-English flapping (/t/ → [ɾ]), dark-l velarisation, and nasal place-assimilation, each a complementary-distribution rule between a phoneme and its conditioned surface forms

    This sourcePhonology textbook treatment of rules deriving surface forms from underlying forms, with voicing assimilation as a worked mechanism.

    Supported in partVerified against the work's full text

    “underlying forms Voicing [Assimilation] surface forms Voicing [Assimilation] also accounts for the”

    Read by an automated reader; not a human review. How support was checked

• Phonotactics
  • English permits the word-initial cluster /str-/ but not /stl-/; Japanese permits almost no coda consonants except /n/; Hawaiian permits no consonant clusters at all

Verification

Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.

Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 3 citations: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.

Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.

See how references were verified.

Registry ID ref:3f555ada38e0 · see in the full table