Analogy and Interpretation in Legal Argumentation¶
Canale, D., & Tuzet, G. (2014). Analogy and Interpretation in Legal Argumentation. Argumentation Library.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Analogia Legis
- In a standard doctrinal account, extensive interpretation keeps the target within a defensible meaning of an existing provision
This sourceStates the standard doctrinal boundary between extensive interpretation and analogy - extending the meaning of an existing norm versus creating one to fill a gap - while arguing that the two are hard to tell apart in practice, since their outcomes coincide.
SupportedVerified against the source
- In a standard doctrinal account, extensive interpretation keeps the target within a defensible meaning of an existing provision
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:3f9369b50ef2 · see in the full table