OHA Principles and Best Practices¶
Oral History Association. (2018). OHA Principles and Best Practices.
Cited by¶
2 citations across 2 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Mechanisms¶
- Oral-History Interview Program
- Its strength is that it captures situated accounts formal records systematically omit, with the ethical scaffolding
This sourceRequires oral-history work to document informed consent and provenance, attend to potential harm, preserve testimony, and treat narrators respectfully rather than extractively.
- Its strength is that it captures situated accounts formal records systematically omit, with the ethical scaffolding
- Tiered Access, Embargo, and Redaction Schedule
- Its strength is that it dissolves the false choice between permanent public exposure and total disappearance, letting a collection preserve difficult testimony while calibrating who meets it to consent, dignity, and safety.
This sourceCalls for preserving oral histories while honoring narrator agreements, consent documentation, and restrictions on access and distribution.
- Its strength is that it dissolves the false choice between permanent public exposure and total disappearance, letting a collection preserve difficult testimony while calibrating who meets it to consent, dignity, and safety.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. Neither this nor any other of the 2 citations of this work carries a recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:3fa1b89440d8 · see in the full table