Über die Wirkung von Bereichsbildungen im Spurenfeld¶
von Restorff, H. (1933). Über die Wirkung von Bereichsbildungen im Spurenfeld. Psychologische Forschung, 18(1), 299-342.
Cited by¶
3 citations across 3 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Sequential Clarity
- On later recall the lone isolate was remembered far more reliably than any of its surrounding list-mates
This sourceThe original isolation experiments, in which an item isolated among homogeneous list-mates was reproduced markedly better than the items of the homogeneous run.
SupportedVerified against the source
- On later recall the lone isolate was remembered far more reliably than any of its surrounding list-mates
Mechanisms¶
- Isolation Framing
- Isolation is the fastest win in a cluttered field, because the move is to take things away, and an item set apart is also better noticed and remembered.
This sourceShows that an item isolated from an otherwise homogeneous set is better remembered.
- Isolation is the fastest win in a cluttered field, because the move is to take things away, and an item set apart is also better noticed and remembered.
- Vivid Association Prompt
- Its strength is that distinctiveness is genuine leverage: the von Restorff effect shows an item made to stand out from its neighbors is remembered out of proportion to the rest, and a good prompt manufactures that standout cheaply.
This sourceDescribes the von Restorff effect: an item made distinctive relative to neighboring items is remembered disproportionately well.
- Its strength is that distinctiveness is genuine leverage: the von Restorff effect shows an item made to stand out from its neighbors is remembered out of proportion to the rest, and a good prompt manufactures that standout cheaply.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 3 citations: 1 supported. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Was it audited? Yes. A second, independent pass read the citation against the article text and recorded a verdict.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:401b44a226bd · see in the full table