Lessons from Russia's Operations in Crimea and Eastern Ukraine¶
Kofman, M. (2014). Lessons from Russia's Operations in Crimea and Eastern Ukraine.
Cited by¶
2 citations across 2 artifacts.
Domain-specific¶
- Hybrid Warfare
- and was sharpened by Russia's 2014 operations in Crimea and eastern Ukraine, which combined unmarked special forces, irregular proxies, economic pressure, cyber operations, and disinformation into a campaign that achieved substantial territorial and political outcomes without crossing NATO's response threshold
Supported in partVerified against a saved copy of the source
“This report assesses the annexation of Crimea by Russia (February–March 2014) and the early phases of political mobilization and combat operations in Eastern Ukraine”
- and was sharpened by Russia's 2014 operations in Crimea and eastern Ukraine, which combined unmarked special forces, irregular proxies, economic pressure, cyber operations, and disinformation into a campaign that achieved substantial territorial and political outcomes without crossing NATO's response threshold
- Multi-Instrument Coordinated Campaign
- Under unified direction it combined unmarked special-operations forces (the "little green men"), an intense information and propaganda effort, cyber operations, economic and energy leverage, and political subversion through local proxies, sequenced to seize facts on the ground before a conventional military response could be organized or justified
Supported in partVerified against a saved copy of the source
“Russia's operation to annex Crimea represented a decisive and competent use of military force in pursuit of political ends.”
- Under unified direction it combined unmarked special-operations forces (the "little green men"), an intense information and propaganda effort, cyber operations, economic and energy leverage, and political subversion through local proxies, sequenced to seize facts on the ground before a conventional military response could be organized or justified
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 2 of 2 citations: 2 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:40c90be9659f · see in the full table