Provenance in databases¶
Cheney, J., Chiticariu, & Tan, W. -. (2009). Provenance in databases: Why, how, and where. Foundations and Trends in Databases, 1(4), 379-474.
Cited by¶
2 citations across 2 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Provenance
- Are gaps explicable or suspicious?**, a forensic decomposition Cheney, Chiticariu, and Tan (2009) systematize in their treatment of database provenance.
This sourceSurvey developing the formal separation between provenance (assertional claim about origin) and the operational lineage infrastructure (queryable evidence structure) that supports it.
- Are gaps explicable or suspicious?**, a forensic decomposition Cheney, Chiticariu, and Tan (2009) systematize in their treatment of database provenance.
- Traceability
- With traceability, every branch and decision becomes auditable.
This sourceSurvey developing the formal separation between provenance (assertional claim about origin) and the operational lineage infrastructure (queryable evidence structure) that supports it.
- With traceability, every branch and decision becomes auditable.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. Neither this nor any other of the 2 citations of this work carries a recorded support check.
Was it audited? Yes. A second, independent pass read the citation against the article text and recorded a verdict.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:40d295d0218b · see in the full table