Cavendish Square Holding BV v Makdessi; ParkingEye Ltd v Beavis¶
UK Supreme Court. (2015). Cavendish Square Holding BV v Makdessi; ParkingEye Ltd v Beavis.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Liquidated Damages
- The UK Supreme Court's Cavendish/ParkingEye reasoning instead frames the English penalty rule for secondary breach obligations around whether the detriment is out of all proportion to a legitimate interest; that is not one universal two-prong test shared by all jurisdictions.
This sourceThe penalty-rule discussion and the consumer-charge application should not be conflated.
- The UK Supreme Court's Cavendish/ParkingEye reasoning instead frames the English penalty rule for secondary breach obligations around whether the detriment is out of all proportion to a legitimate interest; that is not one universal two-prong test shared by all jurisdictions.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:4111235febec · see in the full table