Die Algentypen der Flechtengonidien¶
Schwendener, S. (1869). Die Algentypen der Flechtengonidien: Programm für die Rectoratsfeier der Universität Basel.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Symbiosis
- A lichen biologist asking "what flows between alga and fungus, what is the obligacy for each, are they co-evolving?" — a question whose modern form traces to Schwendener (1869) and his then-radical hypothesis that lichens are dual organisms — is asking the same structural questions as a platform strategist asking "what flows between platform and developers, what is their obligacy, how does platform API change induce developer response?"
This sourceThe original "dual hypothesis" of lichens, proposing that what appeared to be a single organism is in fact an alga and a fungus in sustained partnership; foundational for treating apparently unitary entities as coupled symbiotic systems.
Supported in partVerified against the work's full text
Schwendener states the dual-organism thesis: lichens are colonies of a ruling Ascomycete fungus and enslaved green algae, not single plants.
“sind nun alle diese Gewächse nicht einfache Pflanzen ... Der Beherrscher ist ein Pilz aus der Klasse der Ascomyceten ... seine Sclaven sind grüne Algen”
- A lichen biologist asking "what flows between alga and fungus, what is the obligacy for each, are they co-evolving?" — a question whose modern form traces to Schwendener (1869) and his then-radical hypothesis that lichens are dual organisms — is asking the same structural questions as a platform strategist asking "what flows between platform and developers, what is their obligacy, how does platform API change induce developer response?"
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:4126ac5adf93 · see in the full table