Industry Sponsorship and Research Outcome¶
Lundh, A. (2017). Industry Sponsorship and Research Outcome. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Genetic Fallacy
- Funding can raise a rational concern about design choices, selective reporting, or access to data
This sourceThe Cochrane review establishes why the concern is rational rather than merely suspicious - industry-sponsored studies more often report favourable results and conclusions, and the difference is not explained by standard risk-of-bias assessment; it does not localise the effect to design, selective reporting or data access.
Supported in partVerified against the source
- Funding can raise a rational concern about design choices, selective reporting, or access to data
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:415ad5d76000 · see in the full table