Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation¶
Davidson, D. (2001). Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation. Oxford University Press.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Mechanisms¶
- Counterreading Stress Review
- The disciplines that keep it honest are to build the rival under the principle of charity, in its strongest form; to apply the review symmetrically to the favored reading and its rival alike; and to fix the resolution rule before the verdict rather than after.
This sourceUses the principle of charity to interpret a speaker as largely coherent and correct by the interpreter's own standards.
- The disciplines that keep it honest are to build the rival under the principle of charity, in its strongest form; to apply the review symmetrically to the favored reading and its rival alike; and to fix the resolution rule before the verdict rather than after.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:416aebf64ec9 · see in the full table