Penser la Révolution française¶
Furet, F. (1789). Penser la Révolution française.
Cited by¶
3 citations across 2 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Continuity vs. Rupture
- Revisionism
- The French Revolution historiography underwent a major revisionist turn beginning in the 1960s, led by scholars such as Furet (1978) who challenged the Marxist "bourgeois revolution" consensus that had dominated the field since the early twentieth century.
This sourceGallimard. Reframes the long Marxist-revisionist deadlock over 1789 as itself an interpretive choice rather than a factual dispute; demonstrates how reframing what kind of dispute is being conducted can dissolve apparent empirical disagreements.
- The revisionist wave did not invent new facts but brought three categories of new input into contact with the prior interpretive framework: demographic data showing regional variation and social mobility that the class-conflict model had obscured, the Annales-school longue-durée methodology that shifted attention to structural persistence rather than revolutionary rupture, and archival work on local grievances that demonstrated how widely distributed anti-absolutist sentiment was across the social hierarchy, as Furet's 1978 Penser la Révolution française synthesized.
- The French Revolution historiography underwent a major revisionist turn beginning in the 1960s, led by scholars such as Furet (1978) who challenged the Marxist "bourgeois revolution" consensus that had dominated the field since the early twentieth century.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. Neither this nor any other of the 3 citations of this work carries a recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:4238f38a28ed · see in the full table