Cross-boundary teaming for innovation

Edmondson, A. C., & Harvey, J. (2018). Cross-boundary teaming for innovation: Integrating research on teams and knowledge in organizations. Human Resource Management Review, 28(4), 347-360.

Type

Journal article

Intellectual base

Primary research

Year

2018

Volume

28

Issue

4

Pages

347-360

DOI

10.1016/j.hrmr.2017.03.002

DOI registrant

Elsevier

Link

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2017.03.002

Cited from

art_aesthetics, engineering_design

Cited by

5 citations across 5 artifacts.

Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.

Primes

• Affordance
  • Listed in the references but not attached to a specific claim.
• Concurrent, Cross-Functional Collaboration
  • A common failure is pretending there is shared authority while maintaining individual accountability, leading to passive-aggressive behavior and conflict avoidance

    This sourceIntegrative review arguing that effective cross-boundary (cross-functional/cross-disciplinary) teaming for innovation depends on psychological safety and shared/transactive mental models so that specialists voice and integrate divergent knowledge in real time. WebSearch-verified as the REAL Edmondson & Harvey 2018 paper; replaces the prime's prior (conflated) citation — see flag.

• Contrast
  • Listed in the references but not attached to a specific claim.
• Design Prototyping

  • This source(Bibliography-only — uncited in body. NOTE: the prime's stored title 'The fearless organization…' and venue 'Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 54(2), 110–132' do not match a verified Edmondson & Harvey 2018 article; left flagged.)

• Gestalt Principles
  • Listed in the references but not attached to a specific claim.

Verification

Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.

Does it back the claim? Not recorded. Neither this nor any other of the 5 citations of this work carries a recorded support check.

Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.

See how references were verified.

Registry ID ref:42cd142d79a4 · see in the full table