contact hypothesis¶
The. (1954). contact hypothesis. The Nature of Prejudice.
Retired. This entry was not a citation. Our extractor stored an inline prose definition from the article as though it were a bibliographic record, so its title is the name of a concept rather than of a published work. The page is kept because links to it still resolve, but it is withdrawn from the reference list. This entry is kept so the citations that pointed at it still resolve, and so the correction is visible rather than silent.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Mechanisms¶
- Cooperative Contact Program
- Its strength is that, done under the right conditions, repeated cooperative contact is among the most robust ways to reduce inter-group prejudice — but the conditions are the whole point.
This sourceContact lacking these conditions can increase hostility, which is the failure mode this program is built to avoid.
- Its strength is that, done under the right conditions, repeated cooperative contact is among the most robust ways to reduce inter-group prejudice — but the conditions are the whole point.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.
Was it audited? Yes. A second, independent pass read the citation against the article text and recorded a verdict.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:4343dfc7fe93 · see in the full table