What Do We Know about Proximity and Distance in Work Groups? A Legacy of Research¶
Kiesler, S., & Cummings, J. N. (2002). What Do We Know about Proximity and Distance in Work Groups? A Legacy of Research. Distributed Work.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Co-location
- Once that split is made, several arguments that looked substantive turn out to be equivocations — "they share an office, so of course they collaborate" and "they work remotely, so they cannot be genuinely present to each other" both trade on the merged term and both dissolve when it is separated.
This sourceReviews the evidence that proximity facilitates rather than guarantees collaboration, and that distributed groups can work effectively given cohesion and structure, so neither same-place-therefore-collaboration nor apart-therefore-no-presence holds as an entailment.
- Once that split is made, several arguments that looked substantive turn out to be equivocations — "they share an office, so of course they collaborate" and "they work remotely, so they cannot be genuinely present to each other" both trade on the merged term and both dissolve when it is separated.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:434d7d793916 · see in the full table