DSM-5 Field Trials in the United States and Canada, Part II: Test-Retest Reliability of Selected Categorical Diagnoses¶
Regier. (2013). DSM-5 Field Trials in the United States and Canada, Part II: Test-Retest Reliability of Selected Categorical Diagnoses: Test-Retest Reliability of Selected Categorical Diagnoses. American Journal of Psychiatry.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Label Ambiguity
- Clinical prediction — Sepsis-3 versus SIRS labels, psychiatric diagnoses (depression versus adjustment disorder)
This sourceThe DSM-5 field trials' test-retest kappa estimates for selected psychiatric diagnoses, which ranged from very good to unacceptable.
Supported in partVerified against the publisher's abstract
“Overall, five diagnoses were in the very good range(kappa=0.60–0.79), nine in the good range(kappa=0.40–0.59), six in the questionable range (kappa = 0.20–0.39), and three in the unacceptable range (kappa values,0.20).”
- Clinical prediction — Sepsis-3 versus SIRS labels, psychiatric diagnoses (depression versus adjustment disorder)
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This work's DOI is recorded above but has not been resolved against an external catalogue, so nothing here confirms the work exists.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:4366cff007ff · see in the full table