Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill, 470 U.S. 532¶
U.S. Supreme Court. (1985). Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill, 470 U.S. 532.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Mechanisms¶
- Hearing Procedure
- Its strength is that it converts a decision made about someone into one made with their answer, so even the party who ultimately loses was engaged rather than merely processed; a public employee's entitlement to notice and an opportunity to respond before deprivation is the workplace expression of that owed voice.
This source470 U.S. 532. (1985). Loudermill requires notice and a pretermination opportunity for a public employee to present their side, turning the proposed decision into one made after hearing the affected party's answer.
- Its strength is that it converts a decision made about someone into one made with their answer, so even the party who ultimately loses was engaged rather than merely processed; a public employee's entitlement to notice and an opportunity to respond before deprivation is the workplace expression of that owed voice.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.
Was it audited? Yes. A second, independent pass read the citation against the article text and recorded a verdict.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:445a8e55a18f · see in the full table