Flow regime, temperature, and biotic interactions drive differential declines of trout species under climate change¶
Wenger, S. J., Isaak, D. J., Luce, C. H., Neville, H. M., Fausch, K. D., Dunham, J. B., Dauwalter, D. C., et al. (2011). Flow regime, temperature, and biotic interactions drive differential declines of trout species under climate change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Shelford's Law of Tolerance
- Seth Wenger and colleagues (PNAS, 2011) combined stream-temperature, flow-regime, and biotic-interaction effects in statistical habitat models for four trout species (cutthroat, brook, brown, and rainbow) across the interior western United States and projected that suitable habitat would shrink substantially by the 2080s — a mean 47% decline for all trout, with the native cutthroat trout losing a further 58% of its habitat as temperatures rose beyond its physiological optima
This sourceWenger and colleagues' projection of a mean 47% loss of trout habitat in the interior western US by the 2080s from warming and altered flows, including a further 58% loss for native cutthroat trout.
SupportedVerified against the source
- Seth Wenger and colleagues (PNAS, 2011) combined stream-temperature, flow-regime, and biotic-interaction effects in statistical habitat models for four trout species (cutthroat, brook, brown, and rainbow) across the interior western United States and projected that suitable habitat would shrink substantially by the 2080s — a mean 47% decline for all trout, with the native cutthroat trout losing a further 58% of its habitat as temperatures rose beyond its physiological optima
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:446e61297a1a · see in the full table