Sequencing in Conversational Openings¶
SCHEGLOFF, E. A. (1968). Sequencing in Conversational Openings. American Anthropologist.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Setup–Resolution Pair
- The initiating element does not merely come first; it fixes what would count as an adequate answer, which is why the relation supports a question that bare sequence cannot answer: at any moment in between, is the demand still outstanding?
This sourceIntroduces conditional relevance: given a first item, a second of a specified class is expectable, and until it arrives it is officially absent rather than merely missing - the standing question of whether the demand is still outstanding.
Supported in partVerified against the publisher's abstract
The abstract confirms only that this article develops 'conditional relevance' and 'nonterminality'; it never states that the initiating item fixes an adequate answer or that the pair forms one completed unit.
“Two formulations of conversational openings are suggested and the properties “nonterminality” and “conditional relevance” are developed to explicate the operation of one of them and to suggest some of its interactional consequences.”
- The initiating element does not merely come first; it fixes what would count as an adequate answer, which is why the relation supports a question that bare sequence cannot answer: at any moment in between, is the demand still outstanding?
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:44bf597816f7 · see in the full table