Joint Framework on Countering Hybrid Threats: a European Union Response¶
European Commission, & High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy. (2016). Joint Framework on Countering Hybrid Threats: a European Union Response: a European Union Response. European Commission.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Domain-specific¶
- Hybrid Warfare
- The same reading carries across adversaries (Russia in Crimea and Donbas, Chinese South-China-Sea grey-zone activity, Iranian proxy strategy, Hezbollah in 2006) and across operational settings (kinetic, cyber, economic, informational), and Western alliances have adopted the frame explicitly (NATO's hybrid-threats planning category and Counter Hybrid Strategy, the EU's Hybrid CoE in Helsinki)
Supported in partVerified against a saved copy of the source
“the concept aims to capture the mixture of coercive and subversive activity, conventional and unconventional methods (i.e. diplomatic, military, economic, technological), which can be used in a coordinated manner by state or non-state actors to achieve specific objectives while remaining below the threshold of formally declared warfare”
- The same reading carries across adversaries (Russia in Crimea and Donbas, Chinese South-China-Sea grey-zone activity, Iranian proxy strategy, Hezbollah in 2006) and across operational settings (kinetic, cyber, economic, informational), and Western alliances have adopted the frame explicitly (NATO's hybrid-threats planning category and Counter Hybrid Strategy, the EU's Hybrid CoE in Helsinki)
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:44d6a63b3d5a · see in the full table