Group inhibition of bystander intervention in emergencies¶
Latané, B., & Darley, J. M. (1968). Group inhibition of bystander intervention in emergencies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 10(3), 215-221.
Cited by¶
2 citations across 2 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Bystander Effect
This sourceCanonical experimental evidence for the bystander effect using the smoke-filled-room paradigm; foundational to the three-mechanism model (diffusion, ignorance, apprehension).
- Responsibility Diffusion
- Diffusion of responsibility predicts that a single witness to an emergency has higher rescue probability than one of many witnesses, despite the latter having more aggregate capacity, a relationship Latané and Darley (1968) quantified in their seizure-emergency experiments showing intervention rates dropping from 85% (alone) to 31% (in groups of four).
This sourceQuantifies the inverse relationship between number of witnesses and intervention probability in staged seizure emergencies, with intervention rates dropping from ~85% (alone) to ~31% (groups of four).
- Diffusion of responsibility predicts that a single witness to an emergency has higher rescue probability than one of many witnesses, despite the latter having more aggregate capacity, a relationship Latané and Darley (1968) quantified in their seizure-emergency experiments showing intervention rates dropping from 85% (alone) to 31% (in groups of four).
Verification¶
This reference passed the adversarial substantiation pipeline: it was checked to exist and to support the claim it is attached to. See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:4531fd16c8f3 · see in the full table