Writing Systems¶
Sampson, G. (1985). Writing Systems: A Linguistic Introduction. Stanford University Press.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Phonology
- Linguistic and clinical phonology — describes any language's sound pattern and, in speech-language pathology, separates dialectal variation from genuine deviation against a target system. Computational linguistics and speech technology — phoneme inventories, phonotactic models, and prosodic structure underpin automatic speech recognition and text-to-speech. Historical linguistics — the system-over-inventory commitment licenses reconstructing proto-languages, with sound change read as motion of a structured inventory (chain shifts, mergers, splits) where one phoneme's move predicts a compensating move elsewhere. Writing-system design — phonological analysis grounds alphabetic and feature-based orthographies, Korean Hangul being the canonical feature-based script
This sourceThe featural category of writing systems with Korean Han'gul as its exemplar (ch. 6), inside a taxonomy of scripts grounded in linguistic analysis.
SupportedVerified against the source
- Linguistic and clinical phonology — describes any language's sound pattern and, in speech-language pathology, separates dialectal variation from genuine deviation against a target system. Computational linguistics and speech technology — phoneme inventories, phonotactic models, and prosodic structure underpin automatic speech recognition and text-to-speech. Historical linguistics — the system-over-inventory commitment licenses reconstructing proto-languages, with sound change read as motion of a structured inventory (chain shifts, mergers, splits) where one phoneme's move predicts a compensating move elsewhere. Writing-system design — phonological analysis grounds alphabetic and feature-based orthographies, Korean Hangul being the canonical feature-based script
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:4545c072be3a · see in the full table