Scaffolding¶
Belland, B. R. (2014). Scaffolding: Definition, Current Debates, Recommendations. Springer.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Scaffolding
- The practical pedagogical pipeline typically involves: diagnostic assessment of current capability (what can the learner do alone?); scaffold design (what type, grain, and density of support will make the target task achievable?); scaffold delivery (modeling, questioning, hints, worked examples, partial demonstration, peer mediation, or tool-based supports); performance observation; scaffold adjustment (increase density if the learner is still unable to perform, decrease density if the learner is showing internalization); fading (progressive removal of support as competence emerges); and reassessment, as Belland (2014) systematizes in his synthesis of scaffolding's definitional features and current debates.
This sourceSynthesizes definitional features (contingency, fading, transfer of responsibility) and reviews current debates over hard vs soft scaffolds, distributed scaffolding, and computer-based supports.
- The practical pedagogical pipeline typically involves: diagnostic assessment of current capability (what can the learner do alone?); scaffold design (what type, grain, and density of support will make the target task achievable?); scaffold delivery (modeling, questioning, hints, worked examples, partial demonstration, peer mediation, or tool-based supports); performance observation; scaffold adjustment (increase density if the learner is still unable to perform, decrease density if the learner is showing internalization); fading (progressive removal of support as competence emerges); and reassessment, as Belland (2014) systematizes in his synthesis of scaffolding's definitional features and current debates.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.
Was it audited? Yes. A second, independent pass read the citation against the article text and recorded a verdict.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:46388cb0eb3f · see in the full table