System boundaries and input data in consequential life cycle inventory analysis¶
Ekvall, T., & Weidema, B. P. (2004). System boundaries and input data in consequential life cycle inventory analysis. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 9(3), 161-171.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)
- This commitment bifurcates LCA into attributional LCA (assigning burdens to products as they exist in current systems) and consequential LCA (modeling how systems change in response to marginal product decisions), with consequential LCA adding substantial modeling uncertainty but attempting to capture rebound effects and market-response dynamics that attributional LCA misses, as Ekvall and Weidema (2004) lay out in their treatment of consequential system boundaries and input data.
This sourceFoundational treatment distinguishing attributional from consequential LCA and specifying how marginal-technology and market-response choices flow into system-boundary and input-data decisions.
Supported in partVerified against the publisher's abstract
Defines consequential LCA, its system boundaries and marginal data, as the source states; it does not discuss attributional LCA, uncertainty or rebound effects.
“A consequential life cycle assessment (LCA) is designed to generate information on the consequences of decisions.”
- This commitment bifurcates LCA into attributional LCA (assigning burdens to products as they exist in current systems) and consequential LCA (modeling how systems change in response to marginal product decisions), with consequential LCA adding substantial modeling uncertainty but attempting to capture rebound effects and market-response dynamics that attributional LCA misses, as Ekvall and Weidema (2004) lay out in their treatment of consequential system boundaries and input data.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:47044fbb4478 · see in the full table