The Equity Premium¶
Mehra, R., & Prescott, E. C. (1985). The Equity Premium: A Puzzle. Journal of Monetary Economics, 15(2), 145-161.
Cited by¶
5 citations across 5 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Calibration Anomaly
- In finance the equity premium puzzle is the paradigm: a standard consumption model with reasonable risk aversion predicts a tiny risk premium while observation gives a large one, and the factor-of-sixty gap launched decades of theoretical work.
This sourceStates the equity-premium puzzle: a consumption-based general-equilibrium model with plausible risk aversion predicts a premium far smaller than the historically observed one.
- In finance the equity premium puzzle is the paradigm: a standard consumption model with reasonable risk aversion predicts a tiny risk premium while observation gives a large one, and the factor-of-sixty gap launched decades of theoretical work.
- Loss Aversion
- explained the equity-premium puzzle (Mehra-Prescott 1985)
This sourceDocuments that observed equity risk premia are too high for standard expected-utility equilibrium; foundational for equity-premium-puzzle literature and subsequent model extensions.
- explained the equity-premium puzzle (Mehra-Prescott 1985)
- Risk Aversion
- The puzzle implies either that γ must be implausibly high (∼30+) or that the standard model omits critical structural features (rare disasters, habit formation, time-varying risk premiums)
This sourceDocuments that observed long-run equity risk premia are far higher than standard CRRA consumption-based asset-pricing equilibrium predicts for plausible risk-aversion coefficients; foundational for the equity-premium-puzzle literature and subsequent model extensions.
- The puzzle implies either that γ must be implausibly high (∼30+) or that the standard model omits critical structural features (rare disasters, habit formation, time-varying risk premiums)
- Risk–Return Tradeoff
- foundational); the risk-return tradeoff is an equilibrium-market property arising from risk-averse investors aggregating. Not a complete model of return determination — even in its multi-factor extensions, systematic risk explains only part of the cross-sectional variation in returns; empirical pricing anomalies (momentum, value premium, low-volatility anomaly, quality premium) have motivated ongoing model extensions. Not universally validated empirically — the equity-premium puzzle (Mehra-Prescott
This sourceDocuments that observed equity risk premia are too high for standard expected-utility equilibrium; foundational for equity-premium-puzzle literature and subsequent model extensions.
- foundational); the risk-return tradeoff is an equilibrium-market property arising from risk-averse investors aggregating. Not a complete model of return determination — even in its multi-factor extensions, systematic risk explains only part of the cross-sectional variation in returns; empirical pricing anomalies (momentum, value premium, low-volatility anomaly, quality premium) have motivated ongoing model extensions. Not universally validated empirically — the equity-premium puzzle (Mehra-Prescott
Domain-specific¶
Verification¶
This reference passed the adversarial substantiation pipeline: it was checked to exist and to support the claim it is attached to. See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:489c3503467f · see in the full table