Control of a COVID-19 outbreak in a nursing home by general screening and cohort isolation in Germany, March to May 2020.¶

Krone, M., Noffz, A., Richter, E., Vogel, U., & Schwab, M. (2021). Control of a COVID-19 outbreak in a nursing home by general screening and cohort isolation in Germany, March to May 2020. Eurosurveillance, 26(1).

Type: Journal article
Intellectual base: Primary research
Year: 2021
Volume: 26
Issue: 1
ISSN: 1560-7917
DOI: 10.2807/1560-7917.es.2021.26.1.2001365
DOI registrant: European Centre for Disease Control and Prevention
Link: https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2021.26.1.2001365
Cited from: computer_science

Cited by¶

1 citation across 1 artifact.

Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.

Primes¶

Bulkhead Pattern
- Public health — quarantine cohorts, school bubble groups, and separate hospital ventilation zones partition a population so a local outbreak does not reach the whole.
  This sourceDocuments cohort isolation (grouping residents by infection status into separated cohorts) as the intervention that contained a nursing-home outbreak — population partitioning so a local outbreak does not reach the whole.
  
  Supported in partVerified against the work's full text
  
  The paper documents cohort isolation partitioning a nursing home into separate areas, teams and access routes to contain an outbreak, but not school bubbles or hospital ventilation zones.
  
  “Staff were divided into permanent and physically separate teams for each area. Access to the two areas, supply and disposal was ensured by separate staircases and lifts.”
  From the work's full text.
  
  Read by an automated reader; not a human review. How support was checked

Verification¶

Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.

Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.

Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.

See how references were verified.

Registry ID ref:4a039bd5ae70 · see in the full table