Drug Supply Chain Security Act¶
Drug Supply Chain Security Act, P. (2013). Drug Supply Chain Security Act.
Cited by¶
2 citations across 2 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Traceability
- The U.S. Drug Supply Chain Security Act (DSCSA, 2013) requires pharmaceutical manufacturers, repackagers, wholesale distributors, and dispensers to maintain unit-level transaction information enabling forward and backward tracing of prescription drug products.
This source21 U.S.C. § 360eee et seq. Federal statute requiring unit-level transaction information, history, and statements throughout the prescription-drug supply chain to enable forward and backward tracing for recall and counterfeit detection.
- The U.S. Drug Supply Chain Security Act (DSCSA, 2013) requires pharmaceutical manufacturers, repackagers, wholesale distributors, and dispensers to maintain unit-level transaction information enabling forward and backward tracing of prescription drug products.
Domain-specific¶
- Returns Friction
- In regulated settings — pharmaceutical recalls, medical-device recalls, hazardous-material returns — the friction compounds from an operational nuisance into a patient-safety or compliance exposure, because recall-execution completeness and speed depend on the same infrastructure the forward network was not designed to provide in reverse.
Supported in partVerified against a saved copy of the source
“quarantine such product within the possession or control of the manufacturer from product intended for distribution until such product is cleared or dispositioned”
- In regulated settings — pharmaceutical recalls, medical-device recalls, hazardous-material returns — the friction compounds from an operational nuisance into a patient-safety or compliance exposure, because recall-execution completeness and speed depend on the same infrastructure the forward network was not designed to provide in reverse.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 2 citations: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Was it audited? Yes. A second, independent pass read the citation against the article text and recorded a verdict.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:4aa2cb74e16d · see in the full table